TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Upholds Order on Penalty Proceedings under IT Act</h1> <h3>The ITO, Ward-1, Kishangarh. Versus Shri Kailash Chand Bangur, M/s Arun Marble Traders</h3> The ITO, Ward-1, Kishangarh. Versus Shri Kailash Chand Bangur, M/s Arun Marble Traders - TMI Issues:Recalling of order dated 12.02.2019 by the Revenue based on alleged mistake in the impugned order regarding validity of initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act.Analysis:The Revenue sought to recall the order dated 12.02.2019 of the Tribunal due to an alleged mistake in the impugned order related to the validity of the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The Revenue argued that the Tribunal did not consider the judgment of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Sundaram Finance Ltd. vs. ACIT, which was in favor of the Revenue. The Revenue contended that the Tribunal's failure to consider this judgment amounted to a mistake apparent on the record requiring rectification. However, the Tribunal disagreed with this contention, stating that it had taken a firm view supported by various judgments, including the judgment of the Hon'ble jurisdiction High Court. The Tribunal highlighted that the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court was not cited or relied upon by the Revenue during the appeal hearing. The Tribunal emphasized that even in cases of divergent views among High Courts, it is bound by the view of the jurisdiction High Court. The Tribunal held that the jurisdiction under section 254(2) of the Act is limited and does not permit a review or revision of its own decision on merits. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's Miscellaneous Application, finding no merit in the request for recalling the order.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application of the Revenue, upholding its original order dated 12.02.2019 regarding the validity of the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The Tribunal emphasized the limited scope of review under section 254(2) of the Act and the binding nature of the jurisdiction High Court's decisions on the Tribunal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
