Court orders release of detained lubricant oil and vehicle due to insufficient grounds under GST Act Section 129

The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the immediate release of the detained consignment of lubricant oil and vehicle. The court found the reasons for detention insufficient under Section 129 of the GST Act, emphasizing that the discrepancies in the e-way bill and tax collection did not warrant the detention. The petitioner's argument regarding the consignee's GSTIN on the invoice and the tax mention in the delivery challan being a mistake was accepted. The court deemed the detention unjustified and instructed prompt clearance upon presentation of the judgment to the authorities.

---

---

Issues: Detention of consignment due to discrepancies in e-way bill and collection of CGST and SGST in delivery challan leading to suspicion about the nature of the transaction.

Analysis:
- The petitioner challenged the detention order of a consignment of lubricant oil based on discrepancies in the e-way bill and the collection of CGST and SGST in the delivery challan. The 1st respondent objected to the consignee being listed as an unregistered person in the e-way bill, and the collection of taxes raised suspicions about the transaction.
- The petitioner argued that despite the consignee being unregistered in the e-way bill, the accompanying invoice contained the consignee's GSTIN, rendering the e-way bill discrepancy insignificant. Additionally, the tax mention in the delivery challan was deemed a mistake as tax payment is not required for stock transfers.
- After hearing both parties, the court found the reasons for detention insufficient to invoke Section 129 of the GST Act. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the immediate release of the goods and vehicle covered by the detention notice upon presenting a copy of the judgment to the 1st respondent.
- The court emphasized that the detention was unjustified, allowing the writ petition and instructing the Government Pleader to inform the 1st respondent of the judgment for prompt clearance of the goods and vehicle. The petitioner was required to provide a copy of the judgment and the writ petition to the 1st respondent for further action.

---