Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the allotment of shares in the amalgamated company, pursuant to a scheme of amalgamation, involved a transfer of the assessee's shares in the amalgamating companies within section 12B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, so as to give rise to a capital loss.
Analysis: The share allotment under the amalgamation scheme was not treated as a mere fresh issue divorced from the existing holdings. The assessee parted with its shares in the amalgamating companies in favour of the amalgamated company in return for shares allotted under the scheme. Even though the amalgamating companies ceased to exist by operation of law after amalgamation, the transaction still amounted to a transfer of the assessee's capital assets for the purposes of section 12B. The court also held that the reframed question properly focused on whether there was a transfer, and not merely on the narrower label of exchange.
Conclusion: The transaction fell within section 12B and the answer was in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the department.
Ratio Decidendi: In a scheme of amalgamation, where a shareholder's shares in the amalgamating companies are surrendered and shares in the amalgamated company are allotted in return, the shareholder's relinquishment amounts to a transfer of capital assets within the capital gains provision even if the amalgamating companies cease to exist by operation of law.