Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment and all subsequent proceedings were void for breach of the mandatory procedure under section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, when the Assessing Officer issued and served the demand notice along with the draft assessment order and penalty notice on the same date.
Analysis: Section 144C contemplates a staged procedure: issuance of a draft assessment order, opportunity to object before the Dispute Resolution Panel, and completion of assessment only thereafter in conformity with the statutory route. The issuance and service of the demand notice, along with initiation of penalty proceedings, were treated as having brought the proceedings to a concluded stage on the same date, thereby bypassing the mandatory sub-sections governing completion of assessment. The requirement under section 144C was held to be mandatory and not a mere irregularity. Participation in later proceedings did not cure the defect, as estoppel cannot operate against statute, and section 292B could not validate an order passed without jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The additional ground was allowed, the subsequent DRP and final assessment orders were held to be non est, and the assessment was invalid for non-compliance with section 144C.