Court permits impleading of HDFC Bank, quashes tax attachment, orders account defreeze, balances maintained

The Court allowed the impleading of respondent HDFC Bank in the case under Order 1 Rule 10. The writ petition seeking to quash the provisional attachment of bank accounts and property under the PGST/CGST Act was disposed of, directing the defreezing of all accounts and maintaining the balance present at the time of attachment. The Court's decision was based on the acknowledgment of the overdrawn amount and lack of opposition from the respondent, leading to a fair resolution of the matter.

---

---

Issues:
1. Application under Order 1 Rule 10 for impleading respondent HDFC Bank
2. Writ petition seeking to quash order confirming provisional attachment of bank account and property under the PGST/CGST Act

Analysis:
1. The judgment begins with an application under Order 1 Rule 10 for impleading HDFC Bank as respondent No.4, which is allowed, and the Amended Memo of Parties is taken on record. This procedural aspect is duly addressed by the Court to ensure all relevant parties are included in the case.

2. Moving on to the main issue, the petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order confirming the provisional attachment of bank account and property under the PGST/CGST Act. The petitioner's counsel argued for the defreezing of all seven accounts to allow the petitioner to continue business operations. It was highlighted that the petitioner had overdrawn the CC Account limit, which was acknowledged by the respondent's counsel.

3. The respondent's counsel accepted the overdrawn amount and did not contest the logic behind defreezing the accounts. The learned Addl. Advocate General also did not oppose the prayer made by the petitioner's counsel. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition with the direction to defreeze all accounts and for the petitioner to maintain the balance present in the accounts on the date of provisional attachment.

4. The judgment concludes by stating that since the main case has been decided, any pending applications also stand disposed of. This ensures the completion of all related matters in the case before the Court. The judgment reflects a fair consideration of the petitioner's request and a balanced decision in resolving the issue of the provisional attachment of accounts under the tax laws.

---