Tribunal directs fresh verification of speculation loss issue, recompute section 14A disallowance, COVID-19 procedural adjustments

The Tribunal set aside the issue of deemed speculation loss to the Assessing Officer for fresh verification and recomputation. It directed the AO to recompute the disallowance of expenditure under section 14A, considering only investments yielding exempt income for the year. The appeal by the revenue and the cross-objection by the assessee were treated as allowed for statistical purposes. The order's procedural aspect was addressed due to the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) towards deemed speculation loss by invoking Explanation to section 73 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Additions Made by AO Towards Deemed Speculation Loss by Invoking Explanation to Section 73 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

The revenue appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], which deleted the additions made by the AO towards deemed speculation loss of Rs. 1,85,25,973/- by invoking Explanation to section 73 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The AO had categorized the loss incurred by the assessee from trading in shares as speculative loss, which could not be set off against income from derivative trading. The AO's decision was based on the explanation that any company engaged in the purchase and sale of shares is deemed to be carrying on speculative business. However, the CIT(A) relied on the decision of ITAT, Mumbai, in Fiduciary Shares & Stock Pvt. Ltd., which held that the explanation to section 73 inserted by the Finance Act, 2014, is clarificatory and operates retrospectively from 01/04/1977. Therefore, the CIT(A) concluded that the loss incurred from trading in shares should not be treated as speculative loss.

The Tribunal, however, noted that the Supreme Court in Snowtex Investments Ltd. vs. PCIT held that the amendment to Explanation to section 73 is prospective and effective from 01/04/2015. The Tribunal found that the findings of the CIT(A) were contrary to the Supreme Court's settled position. The Tribunal also observed discrepancies between the AO's and CIT(A)'s findings regarding whether the assessee incurred losses or profits from share trading activity. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the issue to the AO for fresh verification and recomputation of profit after considering relevant expenditure related to share trading activity.

2. Disallowance of Expenditure Incurred in Relation to Exempt Income Under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 82,94,849/- made by the AO under section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The assessee argued that the provisions of section 14A were not applicable, and the AO did not record any satisfaction under sub-section (2) of section 14A regarding the correctness of the voluntary disallowance made by the assessee. The CIT(A) rejected the assessee's contention that shares held as stock-in-trade should not be included in the computation of average value of investments, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Maxopp Investments Ltd. vs. CIT.

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s view that shares held as stock-in-trade should be included in the computation of average value of investments for the purpose of disallowance under section 14A. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee's own funds were not sufficient to cover the investments in shares, including shares held as stock-in-trade. Therefore, the interest expenditure could not be excluded from the disallowance computation. The Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the disallowance by considering only those investments that yielded exempt income for the year and to determine the disallowance of expenditure in relation to exempt income under section 14A accordingly.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal set aside the issue of deemed speculation loss to the AO for fresh verification and recomputation. It also directed the AO to recompute the disallowance of expenditure under section 14A, considering only those investments that yielded exempt income for the year. The appeal filed by the revenue and the cross-objection filed by the assessee were treated as allowed for statistical purposes. The procedural aspect of the pronouncement of the order was addressed, considering the nationwide lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

---