Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (7) TMI 472 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Foreclosure charges not taxable as service tax: Tribunal rules in favor of banks and financial companies The tribunal held that foreclosure charges collected by banks and non-banking financial companies on premature termination of loans are not subject to ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Foreclosure charges not taxable as service tax: Tribunal rules in favor of banks and financial companies

                          The tribunal held that foreclosure charges collected by banks and non-banking financial companies on premature termination of loans are not subject to service tax under "banking and other financial services." The charges were deemed as compensation for breach of contract, not consideration for a service provided, thus not falling under taxable services as defined by the Finance Act. The decision favored the respondent, setting aside the demand for service tax and emphasizing that foreclosure charges do not attract service tax liability.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether foreclosure charges levied by banks and non-banking financial companies on premature termination of loans are subject to service tax under "banking and other financial services."

                          Detailed Analysis of the Judgment:

                          Conflicting Tribunal Decisions:
                          1. Hudco vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad (2012): Service tax is leviable on foreclosure charges.
                          2. Magma Fincorp Limited. vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata (2016): Service tax is not leviable on foreclosure charges.
                          3. Small Industries Dev. Bank of India vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad (2015): Referred the matter to a Larger Bench due to conflicting decisions.

                          Case Background:
                          - Respondent: Registered for service tax under "banking and other financial services," provided housing loans, and collected foreclosure charges without paying service tax.
                          - Show Cause Notice: Demanded Rs. 20,50,399/- under section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994.
                          - Joint Commissioner's Order: Confirmed the demand but refrained from imposing penalties.
                          - Commissioner (Appeals): Allowed the appeal, setting aside the Joint Commissioner's order, stating that foreclosure charges are not for rendering any service but are in lieu of anticipated interest loss.

                          Legal Provisions:
                          1. Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994: Levies service tax at 12% on the value of taxable services.
                          2. Section 65 (105) of the Finance Act: Defines "taxable service."
                          3. Section 67 of the Finance Act: Deals with the valuation of taxable services, emphasizing that consideration must be for the service provided.

                          Arguments:
                          - Banks and Non-Banking Financial Companies: Foreclosure charges are not "consideration" for a service but compensation for breach of contract due to premature loan termination.
                          - Revenue: Foreclosure charges are a facility available to borrowers at a price, thus falling under "banking and other financial services."

                          Tribunal’s Analysis:
                          - Consideration Definition: Must flow from the service recipient to the service provider and be for the taxable service provided.
                          - Foreclosure Charges: Viewed as compensation for loss of "expectation interest" due to premature loan termination, not as consideration for a service.
                          - Liquidated Damages: Foreclosure charges are akin to liquidated damages for breach of contract, not a service provided.

                          Key Judgments Referenced:
                          1. Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Service Tax (2013): Consideration must be for the service provided.
                          2. Commissioner of Service Tax vs. M/s Bhayana Builders (2018): Reinforced the nexus between the amount charged and the service provided.
                          3. Union of India vs. Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrafts (2018): Valuation of taxable service is based on the consideration paid for the service provided.

                          Conclusion:
                          - Foreclosure Charges: Are not leviable to service tax as they are not for rendering any service but are compensation for breach of contract.
                          - Hudco Decision: Not accepted as it incorrectly interpreted foreclosure charges as a service.
                          - Final Decision: Foreclosure charges collected by banks and non-banking financial companies on premature termination of loans are not subject to service tax under "banking and other financial services" as defined under section 65 (12) of the Finance Act.

                          Order:
                          - The reference is answered in favor of the respondent, and the appeal is to be listed before the regular Bench for hearing. (Order pronounced on 08 June, 2020)
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found