Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the existence of a moratorium in the corporate insolvency resolution process barred further police steps on a complaint relating to the company's transactions.
Analysis: The moratorium under the insolvency regime was recognised as not necessarily barring criminal proceedings in every case. However, the complaint and the proposed police action were found to be tied to transactions of the company that formed part of the corporate insolvency resolution process. Since any further investigation would necessarily travel into the very subject matter covered by that process, the police had already acted up to the stage permitted before the moratorium took effect and could not reasonably proceed further until the resolution process ended.
Conclusion: The writ petitioner's grievance that the police had failed to take sufficient steps was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The complaint-linked police action was held to be impermissible to continue during the subsistence of the insolvency process, and the writ petition was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where proposed police action would require investigation into transactions that are themselves the subject matter of a corporate insolvency resolution process, further steps may be restrained by the moratorium notwithstanding the general principle that criminal proceedings are not automatically barred.