TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court upholds Tribunal's order on deduction under Section 80IB(10) for joint venture housing project</h1> <h3>The Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Ward III (1), Chennai. Versus M/s. Astoria Leathers, Chennai-32.</h3> The Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Ward III (1), Chennai. Versus M/s. Astoria Leathers, Chennai-32. - TMI Issues:Appeal by Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against a common order related to deduction under Section 80IB(10) for assessment years 2008-09 and 2010-11.Analysis:The High Court of Madras heard the appeals by the Revenue against a common order dated 27.12.2017 made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai. The substantial question of law in question was whether the Tribunal was correct in directing the Assessing Officer to allow deduction under Section 80IB(10) to the assessee landowner despite not incurring expenses towards development or construction of the housing project. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration with specific directions regarding the deduction. The Court noted that the Tribunal's direction should not aggrieve the Revenue. The Court referred to a previous Division Bench judgment in a similar case and various decisions by different courts to support its decision.The Court emphasized that ownership is not the sole criteria for granting deduction under Section 80IB(10), especially in cases of development where the developer is entitled to claim deduction. The Court highlighted that the Revenue's reverse stand on this issue was not tenable, as the Act clearly distinguishes between 'developing' and 'building'. The Court concluded that the assessee, being the developer in a joint venture agreement, was entitled to claim the deduction under Section 80IB(10) for a housing project.Based on the above analysis and precedent, the Court answered the substantial question of law framed in the appeals against the Revenue. The Court dismissed the tax case appeals, confirming the Tribunal's orders of remand and directing the Assessing Officer to follow the Tribunal's directions. No costs were awarded in the case, and the connected CMP was also dismissed.
TaxTMI 