TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail in a prosecution for alleged GST offences involving fake firms and wrongful input tax credit.
Analysis: The application was moved under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in relation to offences under Sections 132(1)(b)(c)(f)(l) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court considered the rival submissions, including the allegation of wrongful input tax credit through fake firms and the fact that a portion of the alleged tax credit had already been deposited, along with the grant of bail to similarly placed co-accused.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the petitioner.
TaxTMI 
