Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the clearances of two private limited companies could be clubbed so as to deny the small-scale industry exemption and sustain the duty demand.
Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. was denied on the premise that the two units functioned as one manufacturer. The governing board circular clarified that private limited companies are separate entities distinct from their shareholders and each such company is entitled to a separate exemption limit. The record showed separate incorporation, separate registrations, different products, separate accounts and work force, demarcated factory space, and only normal commercial dealings. Common shareholders, common directors, common premises features, or occasional fund movements, without proof of profit sharing, account manipulation, or real financial flow back, were insufficient to establish that the units were a single manufacturer. The cited precedents on clubbing of clearances also supported this approach.
Conclusion: The clearances could not be clubbed and the assessee remained entitled to the exemption.
Ratio Decidendi: Private limited companies are separate manufacturers for SSI exemption purposes, and clubbing of clearances requires cogent evidence of real financial interdependence or flow back beyond common management or ordinary commercial transactions.