Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount earlier paid by the declarant was required to be deducted while computing the amount payable under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and whether the impugned Form SVLDRS-3 quantification could be sustained.
Analysis: The Scheme distinguished between the tax dues on which relief was to be computed and the amount already paid as pre-deposit or deposit during enquiry, investigation, audit or appellate proceedings. Section 124(2) mandated deduction of such amounts while issuing the statement indicating the amount payable by the declarant. The Court found that the Designated Committee had not properly considered the petitioner's case on the true application of these provisions and had proceeded to confirm the balance demand without adequate hearing on the computation. In these circumstances, the quantification in Form SVLDRS-3 could not be sustained in its existing form.
Conclusion: The impugned Form SVLDRS-3 was quashed and the matter was sent back for fresh hearing and recomputation after the petitioner deposits the directed amount; the petitioner thus obtained partial relief.