Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts from sale of off-the-shelf software and maintenance and support services, including upgrades, were taxable as royalty under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12 of the India-Finland Tax Treaty.
Analysis: The software distributor agreements granted only a non-exclusive right to market and distribute the software products as copyrighted articles. The distributors had no right to the source code, no authority to modify, reproduce or exploit the underlying copyright, and no transfer of copyright in the software was shown. On that basis, the receipts were held to be sales revenue/business income and not consideration for use of, or right to use, copyright. The later domestic-law amendments to the royalty definition under section 9(1)(vi) could not be read into the treaty, because the treaty contained its own exhaustive definition of royalty and could not be unilaterally expanded by domestic legislation.
Conclusion: The receipts from sale of software and from maintenance and support services, including upgrades, were not royalty under Article 12 of the India-Finland Tax Treaty and were not taxable on that footing. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.