Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (7) TMI 13 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Tribunal Overturns Penalty Due to Non-Specific Notice, Citing Natural Justice and COVID-19 Delays. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tax Tribunal Overturns Penalty Due to Non-Specific Notice, Citing Natural Justice and COVID-19 Delays.

                          The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the penalty notice void ab initio due to its non-specific nature, violating principles of natural justice. The order was pronounced beyond the 90-day period due to COVID-19 lockdown, in line with judicial precedent.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Specificity of the charge in the penalty notice under section 274 read with 271(1)(c).
                          3. Compliance with principles of natural justice.
                          4. Validity of penalty proceedings based on non-specific notices.
                          5. Pronouncement of orders beyond the 90-day period due to extraordinary circumstances.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Imposition of Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act:
                          The appeal was filed by the assessee against the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, which was confirmed by the learned CIT(A). The primary grievance was that the penalty notice did not specify whether the penalty was for "concealment of income" or "furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income."

                          2. Specificity of the Charge in the Penalty Notice under Section 274 read with 271(1)(c):
                          The assessee's representative argued that the show cause notice was not specific about the charge, which is a settled position of law. The notice mentioned both "concealment of income" and "furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income" without specifying the exact charge, indicating non-application of mind by the Assessing Officer. This non-specific nature of the notice was deemed a significant procedural lapse.

                          3. Compliance with Principles of Natural Justice:
                          The Tribunal emphasized that the authority proposing to impose a penalty must be certain about the basis for the penalty, and the notice must reflect that specific reason. This requirement is rooted in the principles of natural justice, ensuring that the assessee can adequately prepare their defense. The Tribunal cited several cases to support this principle, including:
                          - CIT vs. SSA’s Emerald Meadows: The Supreme Court upheld that a non-specific notice under section 274 read with 271(1)(c) is bad in law.
                          - CIT and Another vs. Manjunath Cotton & Ginning Factory: The Karnataka High Court held that a notice must specifically state the grounds for penalty, failing which it offends the principles of natural justice.
                          - Meherjee Cassinath Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT: The ITAT Mumbai emphasized that penalty proceedings are quasi-criminal and must comply with natural justice principles.
                          - Chandra Prakash Bubna vs. ITO: The ITAT Kolkata held that penalties imposed without specifying the charge are liable to be deleted.

                          4. Validity of Penalty Proceedings Based on Non-Specific Notices:
                          The Tribunal concluded that the notice under section 274 read with 271(1)(c) was void ab initio due to its non-specific nature. Consequently, any penalty imposed based on such a notice is illegal and must be deleted. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty imposed on the assessee.

                          5. Pronouncement of Orders Beyond the 90-Day Period Due to Extraordinary Circumstances:
                          The order was pronounced after a period of 90 days from the conclusion of the hearing due to the COVID-19 lockdown. The Tribunal relied on the decision in the case of JSW Ltd, which allowed for the extension of the pronouncement period due to extraordinary circumstances. The Tribunal noted that the lockdown period should be excluded when computing the 90-day period for pronouncement of orders, as per the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court and High Courts during the pandemic.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty imposed was directed to be deleted. The order was pronounced beyond the 90-day period due to the exceptional circumstances of the COVID-19 lockdown, following the judicial precedent set by the JSW Ltd case.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found