Tribunal directs reassessment for registration under section 12AA due to lack of evidence

The Tribunal referred the matter of registration under section 12AA back to the Ld. CIT(E) for reassessment, directing the assessee to provide evidence of its activities. The rejection was based on the lack of genuineness due to insufficient evidence, despite the charitable nature of the activities not being disputed. The appeal against the rejection was allowed for statistical purposes, and the approval under section 80G was also remanded for fresh consideration. Both appeals of the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes, with the decision issued on 25th June 2020.

---

---

Issues:
- Rejection of registration under section 12AA and section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
1. Rejection of Registration under Section 12AA:
The assessee's application for registration under section 12AA was rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) mainly due to the lack of evidence of actual activities, which led to the inability to establish the genuineness of the activities. The rejection was also based on the absence of any change in circumstances since the earlier application withdrawal. The Ld. CIT(E) highlighted that the applicant had not submitted true evidence of expenditure towards charitable activities, thus failing to satisfy the conditions for registration under section 12AA. The rejection was further supported by the absence of evidence of charitable activities, with the activities being deemed theoretical and academic without any substantial charitable impact.

2. Legal Arguments and Decision:
During the proceedings, the assessee's counsel argued that the rejection based on the earlier application's dismissal should not impact the present application. Referring to the Baburam Education Society case, the counsel emphasized the charitable nature of the assessee's objectives, including involvement in health programs with the government. On the other hand, the DR contended that the assessee failed to provide evidence of its activities with the government, and highlighted the presence of another organization at the same address. The Tribunal noted the requirement for charitable objects and genuine activities for registration under section 12AA. It differentiated the case from the Baburam Education Society precedent due to the lack of evidence supporting the claimed activities. The Tribunal also clarified that the earlier rejection was due to withdrawal, not merit, and directed the assessee to provide evidence of its activities for reevaluation.

3. Restoration and Directions:
The Tribunal found that while the charitable nature of the activities was not disputed, the rejection was based on the lack of genuineness due to insufficient evidence. Consequently, the matter of registration under section 12AA was referred back to the Ld. CIT(E) for reassessment with a directive for the assessee to provide necessary details and evidence of its activities. The appeal against the rejection of registration was allowed for statistical purposes. The matter of approval under section 80G was also remanded to the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh consideration. Ultimately, both appeals of the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes, with the decision pronounced on 25th June 2020.

---