Fraudulent input tax credit allegations defeat bail where fake bills and absent transactions weigh against release.

Bail was refused in a prosecution alleging fraudulent input tax credit claims under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court treated the alleged absence of any underlying transaction, together with manipulation of fake bill entries and the economic impact of the conduct, as material factors weighing against release on bail. On that basis, the application was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether bail should be granted to the accused facing prosecution for alleged fraudulent claim of input tax credit under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Analysis: The application was considered in the context of allegations that input tax credit had been claimed without any underlying transaction, involving a substantial amount. The Court treated the alleged manipulation of fake bill entries and the economic impact of such conduct as material factors against the grant of bail.

Conclusion: Bail was declined and the application was rejected.

---