Limitation under insolvency law: post-expiry cheques cannot revive a stale claim or extend time for Section 9 action.

An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was held to be time-barred because the date of default was taken as 7 October 2013 and the proceeding was filed only on 20 April 2018, beyond the three-year period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act. The 2017 cheques did not extend limitation because Section 18 requires a written, signed acknowledgment made before expiry of the limitation period; by then, the claim was already stale. The insolvency admission order could not stand, and the Section 9 proceedings were set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963; (ii) Whether the cheques issued in 2017 amounted to an acknowledgment of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 so as to extend limitation.

Issue (i): Whether the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Analysis: The date of default was taken as 7 October 2013 on the basis of the creditor's own pleadings and demand notice. The application for commencement of insolvency proceedings was filed on 20 April 2018, well beyond the three-year period prescribed by Article 137. Since limitation under Article 137 governs such applications, the claim had become stale before the proceeding was initiated.

Conclusion: The application was barred by limitation and was not maintainable.

Issue (ii): Whether the cheques issued in 2017 amounted to an acknowledgment of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 so as to extend limitation.

Analysis: Section 18 requires an acknowledgment of liability in writing signed before expiry of the prescribed limitation period. The invoices pertained to 2013 and the limitation period expired in 2016. The cheques dated 5 December 2017 were issued after expiry of limitation and therefore could not revive the time-barred claim or create a fresh period of limitation.

Conclusion: The cheques did not amount to a valid acknowledgment for extending limitation.

Final Conclusion: The insolvency admission order could not survive, the proceedings under Section 9 were set aside, and the corporate debtor was released from the consequences flowing from the impugned insolvency initiation.

Ratio Decidendi: An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 must be filed within the period prescribed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and an acknowledgment under Section 18 can extend limitation only if it is made in writing and signed before expiry of the limitation period.

---