Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1973 (12) TMI 29 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Actual cost for depreciation depends on whether liability has ceased and whether the amount was truly borne by the assessee. Depreciation on machinery turned on the meaning of 'actual cost' under two tax regimes. For assessment year 1961-62, the 1922 Act treated actual cost as ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Actual cost for depreciation depends on whether liability has ceased and whether the amount was truly borne by the assessee.

                          Depreciation on machinery turned on the meaning of "actual cost" under two tax regimes. For assessment year 1961-62, the 1922 Act treated actual cost as the assessee's own cost, subject only to the limited statutory adjustment then available, so the machinery cost remained Rs. 30,572. For assessment years 1962-63 to 1965-66, section 43(1) of the 1961 Act required actual cost to be reduced by any amount not in substance borne by the assessee; the cessation of liability to the foreign supplier and the write-back of that liability meant the amount could no longer be treated as part of actual cost for depreciation and written-down value.




                          Issues: (i) Whether, for assessment year 1961-62, depreciation was to be computed on the basis that the actual cost of the machinery to the assessee was Rs. 30,572. (ii) Whether, for assessment years 1962-63 to 1965-66, the assessee was entitled to depreciation on the same basis after the liability to the foreign supplier had ceased and the definition of actual cost under the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied.

                          Issue (i): Whether, for assessment year 1961-62, depreciation was to be computed on the basis that the actual cost of the machinery to the assessee was Rs. 30,572.

                          Analysis: Under the Income-tax Act, 1922, actual cost for depreciation purposes was confined to the cost to the assessee, subject to the statutory adjustment then available only where the cost was met directly or indirectly by Government or by a public or local authority. The machinery was acquired in 1955, the price was credited to the foreign supplier, and the supplier was neither Government nor a public or local authority. On that footing, the later write-back of the liability did not alter the position for the assessment year governed by the 1922 Act.

                          Conclusion: The depreciation for assessment year 1961-62 was rightly allowed on the basis that the cost to the assessee was Rs. 30,572, and this issue is decided in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (ii): Whether, for assessment years 1962-63 to 1965-66, the assessee was entitled to depreciation on the same basis after the liability to the foreign supplier had ceased and the definition of actual cost under the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied.

                          Analysis: Under section 43(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, actual cost means the actual cost to the assessee reduced by any portion met directly or indirectly by any other person or authority. The Court treated the supplier's inaction over several years and the accounting write-back as showing cessation of liability in substance and in fact. Once the 1961 Act applied, the amount no longer represented cost borne by the assessee for those years and had to be excluded in computing actual cost and written down value.

                          Conclusion: The depreciation for assessment years 1962-63 to 1965-66 was wrongly allowed on the basis that the cost to the assessee was Rs. 30,572, and this issue is decided in favour of the revenue.

                          Final Conclusion: The reference was answered partly for the assessee and partly for the revenue, with the allowance of depreciation sustained for assessment year 1961-62 and disallowed on the claimed basis for the later assessment years.

                          Ratio Decidendi: For the 1922 Act, actual cost for depreciation is determined under the then applicable statutory framework, but under the 1961 Act actual cost must be reduced by any amount effectively not borne by the assessee, including a liability that has ceased in substance.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found