Tribunal directs Arm's Length Price determination under TNMM by aggregating transactions, emphasizing software distribution-maintenance link.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the authorities to determine the Arm's Length Price (ALP) under the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) by aggregating the transactions, in line with past practices and the interlinked nature of software distribution and maintenance services. This decision overturned the Transfer Pricing Officer's segregation of maintenance services as technical services, emphasizing the integral relationship between software distribution and maintenance activities.

---

---

Issues:
Transfer pricing adjustment on payment made to AE towards Maintenance services.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The appeal was against the assessment order passed by the assessing officer under section 143(3) r.w.s 144C for the assessment year 2011-12 following directions from the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).
2. The dispute revolved around the Transfer pricing adjustment made in relation to payment made to the Associated Enterprise (AE) for Maintenance services linked to software licenses distribution.
3. The assessee, engaged in software license marketing, sales support, and maintenance activities, purchased software licenses from its AE for resale in India. The dispute arose from the remittance of 40% of sales realization and maintenance charges to the AE.
4. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) accepted the TNMM method for software license sales but viewed maintenance services as technical services, leading to a separate benchmarking and adjustment.
5. The DRP upheld the TPO's decision, applying the Profit Split Method (PSM) to determine income split between the assessee and AE for maintenance services.
6. The assessee argued that maintenance services were integral to software distribution, and the TPO's segregation was unjustified, citing past acceptance of TNMM method by the TPO.
7. The Principle of Consistency was invoked by the assessee, emphasizing the need for uniform treatment by tax authorities based on past practices.
8. The TPO defended the separate treatment of maintenance services, based on functions performed by both parties, leading to the 10% ALP determination.
9. The Tribunal observed the interdependence of software distribution and maintenance services, agreeing with the assessee's stance on their linkage and rejecting the TPO's segregation.
10. The Tribunal noted the consistent 40% payment for maintenance services by the assessee to its AE in previous years, supporting the rejection of the TPO's 10% ALP determination for the current year.
11. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the authorities to determine the ALP under TNMM method by aggregating the transactions, in line with past practices and the interlinked nature of software distribution and maintenance services.

---