Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notices issued for rectification were barred by limitation and, consequently, without jurisdiction.
Analysis: The limitation for rectification under the governing provision ran from the date of the original assessment order, and a prior rectification did not enlarge that period. The statute did not create any fiction that a rectified order would restart limitation in ordinary rectification cases, unlike the specific language used for firm-related rectifications. On the facts, the impugned notice in relation to the 1961-62 assessment was issued beyond four years from the original assessment order. The later notices for the subsequent years were only consequential and depended upon the validity of the first notice.
Conclusion: The rectification notices were time-barred and beyond jurisdiction, and the consequential rectification orders also could not stand.