Limitation on reassessment under VAT law barred reopening once the statutory period had expired.

Reassessment under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act was found barred by limitation because the statutory reopening period had already expired. The Court noted that the reassessment related to 2011-2012 and that, on the facts before it, Section 25(1) could not be invoked after expiry of the prescribed period, whether treated as five years under the earlier position or six years after amendment. The assessment proceedings were therefore quashed as time-barred, and the assessee succeeded.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessment proceedings initiated under Section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 were barred by limitation and liable to be quashed.

Analysis: The dispute related to assessments for 2011-2012. The period for reopening under Section 25(1) had earlier been five years and was later amended to six years. On the facts placed before it, the Court found that the limitation period for reopening had already expired. In view of the statutory limitation and the existing position on the jurisdiction to invoke Section 25 after expiry of the prescribed period, the proceedings could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The assessment proceedings were held to be time-barred and the impugned orders were quashed, in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded because the reassessment action was initiated beyond the permissible period under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: Reassessment or reopening under the statute cannot be sustained once the prescribed limitation period has expired.

---