Appeals allowed for absence of incriminating materials in assessments, partial allowance for restricted disallowance.

The Tribunal allowed the appeals for AYs. 2013-14 and 2014-15 due to the absence of incriminating materials for disallowances under section 14A in unabated assessments. For AY 2016-17, the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) was restricted to .5% of the investment in dividend-yielding scrips, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeal.

---

---

Issues:
- Disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for AYs. 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2016-17.
- Unabated assessment years and the requirement of incriminating materials for additions/disallowances under section 153A.
- Disallowance calculation under Rule 8D for exempt income.

Analysis:

1. Disallowance under Section 14A:
- The appeals were against the disallowance upheld by Ld. CIT(A) under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for AYs. 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2016-17.
- The AO disallowed amounts without incriminating materials for AYs. 2013-14 and 2014-15, leading to the issue of whether such disallowances were legally valid.
- The Ld. AR contended that in unabated assessments, disallowances can only be made based on incriminating materials under section 153A, which were absent in this case.
- The Tribunal agreed, noting that since the assessments were not pending before the AO at the time of the search, no disallowance could be made without incriminating materials, thereby allowing the appeals for AYs. 2013-14 and 2014-15.

2. Unabated Assessment Years and Incriminating Materials:
- The principle of requiring incriminating materials for additions/disallowances under section 153A in unabated assessments was crucial in this case.
- The Ld. AR relied on legal precedents to support the argument that additions in unabated assessments must be based on undisclosed incriminating materials found during the search.
- The Tribunal concurred, emphasizing that without any mention of incriminating material, disallowances under section 14A could not be sustained for AYs. 2013-14 and 2014-15.

3. Disallowance Calculation under Rule 8D:
- For AY 2016-17, where the assessment was abated, the AO made a disallowance under Rule 8D for exempt income.
- The Ld. AR sought a modification to restrict the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) to .5% of the investment in dividend-yielding scrips, which the Tribunal accepted.
- Following the established precedent, the Tribunal directed the AO to limit the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) accordingly, partially allowing the appeal for AY 2016-17.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeals for AYs. 2013-14 and 2014-15 due to the absence of incriminating materials for disallowances under section 14A in unabated assessments. For AY 2016-17, the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) was restricted to .5% of the investment in dividend-yielding scrips, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeal.

---