Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the payment made to the non-resident UK entity for insurance product development and related services constituted fees for technical or consultancy services taxable in India, and whether the exception in section 9(1)(vii)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 or the relevant treaty provisions exempted the payment from tax deduction at source.
Analysis: The payment was held to be for consultancy services, as the foreign entity was engaged to provide advisory and facilitation services in connection with product development, risk management, insurance pricing, market exploration, and related commercial support. Such services were treated as falling within the width of the expression "technical or consultancy services" and, on the facts, the payer had not established an existing business or profession outside India so as to attract the statutory exception in section 9(1)(vii)(b). The treaty provisions were also considered, but the relevant exclusion under Article 13 was found not to apply on the facts placed before the Court. The request to invalidate the tax deduction requirement was therefore not accepted.
Conclusion: The payment was taxable in India and liable to tax deduction at source; the challenge to the impugned order failed.