Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (5) TMI 489 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds addition of unexplained cash credits under Income Tax Act Section 68. Transactions deemed fictitious. The Tribunal upheld the AO's and CIT(A)'s actions in adding Rs. 19,50,000 as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. It found the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal upholds addition of unexplained cash credits under Income Tax Act Section 68. Transactions deemed fictitious.

                            The Tribunal upheld the AO's and CIT(A)'s actions in adding Rs. 19,50,000 as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. It found the transactions involving the sale of shares to be fictitious, lacking in genuineness and creditworthiness. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating the assessee failed to provide credible evidence, and the principles of natural justice were not violated. The order was pronounced on 19/05/2020.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Legitimacy of additions made by the AO and CIT(A) regarding the sale of shares.
                            2. Applicability of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
                            3. Principles of natural justice and opportunity to be heard.
                            4. Double taxation claims.
                            5. Genuineness and creditworthiness of transactions.
                            6. Evidence and documentation to support transactions.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Legitimacy of Additions by AO and CIT(A):
                            The assessee contested the additions of Rs. 10,05,000 and Rs. 9,45,000 made by the AO for income declared on account of the sale of shares of Scholar Steel Pvt. Ltd. and Ravel Metals Pvt. Ltd., respectively. The AO's investigation revealed that the assessee did not hold any shares of Scholar Steel Pvt. Ltd. at the beginning of the year and that Ravel Metals Pvt. Ltd. had been struck off. Consequently, the AO deemed the transactions as non-genuine and applied Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, adding Rs. 19,50,000 as unexplained cash credits.

                            2. Applicability of Section 68:
                            The AO applied Section 68, arguing that the assessee failed to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions. The assessee argued that the sale proceeds were already included in the taxable income and that the provisions of Section 68 should not apply. The Tribunal upheld the AO's application of Section 68, noting that the transactions were fictitious and the assessee did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the claims.

                            3. Principles of Natural Justice:
                            The assessee claimed that the AO did not afford an opportunity to be heard after the submission on 29.11.2016, violating the principles of natural justice. However, the Tribunal found that the assessee was given multiple opportunities to present its case, including six adjournments, and thus, the claim was unfounded.

                            4. Double Taxation Claims:
                            The assessee argued that the additions resulted in double taxation, as the income from the sale of shares was already declared in the Profit and Loss account. The Tribunal dismissed this claim, stating that the sale transactions were bogus and that the income was not genuinely earned, thus justifying the additions under Section 68.

                            5. Genuineness and Creditworthiness of Transactions:
                            The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions. The shareholder list of Scholar Steel Pvt. Ltd. did not include the assessee, and Ravel Metals Pvt. Ltd. was struck off, indicating that the transactions were fictitious. The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not provide any documentary evidence to support the claim of lending shares with blank transfer deeds.

                            6. Evidence and Documentation:
                            The Tribunal emphasized the lack of documentary evidence provided by the assessee to substantiate the transactions. The explanation of lending shares with blank transfer deeds was deemed a "cooked up story," and the absence of any record of such transactions further discredited the assessee's claims. The Tribunal upheld the AO's findings, stating that the assessee's failure to provide credible evidence justified the additions under Section 68.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee, confirming the AO's and CIT(A)'s actions in making additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the transactions were fictitious, the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence, and the principles of natural justice were not violated. The order was pronounced in the open court on 19/05/2020.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found