Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeals were maintainable in view of the CBDT circular enhancing the monetary limit for filing appeals and applying it to pending appeals.
Analysis: The appeals involved tax effect below the enhanced monetary limit prescribed by Circular No. 17/2019, which amended the earlier litigation-management circular and expressly applied to pending appeals. The circular directed that pending appeals below the specified limit may be withdrawn or not pressed. Following the binding administrative policy and the approach approved in the cited Supreme Court order, the appeals could not be pursued further. Liberty was reserved to the Revenue to seek recall in cases wrongly included or falling within exceptions.
Conclusion: The appeals were non-maintainable and liable to be dismissed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeals failed on the ground of low tax effect under the applicable CBDT litigation policy, with only a limited liberty preserved for correction of cases wrongly included.
Ratio Decidendi: CBDT monetary-limit circulars governing filing and continuation of appeals apply to pending appeals and render appeals below the prescribed tax-effect threshold non-maintainable.