Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was right in deleting the penalty for late filing of the return on the basis of reasonable cause and the prevailing departmental practice.
Analysis: Penalty under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is attracted only when the return is not furnished without reasonable cause. The expression confers discretion on the authority to decide whether reasonable cause exists, and the Tribunal was entitled to consider the pre-existing departmental practice followed under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, even if that practice did not strictly accord with the old Act. The existence of reasonable cause depended on the surrounding circumstances and did not raise a question of law. In the circumstances of delayed filing before the end of the assessment year, the Tribunal's view that penalty should not be sustained could not be treated as erroneous in law.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was justified in holding that reasonable cause existed and in setting aside the penalty.