TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Admits CIRP Application against Quickdel Logistics; Appoints Interim Resolution Professional</h1> <h3>Grey Orange India (P.) Ltd. Versus Quickdel Logistics (P.) Ltd.</h3> Grey Orange India (P.) Ltd. Versus Quickdel Logistics (P.) Ltd. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP)2. Existence of operational debt and default3. Pre-existing dispute4. Limitation period for filing the application5. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP)6. Declaration of MoratoriumDetailed Analysis:1. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP):The application was filed by Grey Orange India Pvt. Ltd. under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of CIRP against Quickdel Logistics Pvt. Ltd. The application was supported by an affidavit and a Board resolution authorizing the filing. The Tribunal confirmed jurisdiction based on the registered address of Quickdel.2. Existence of Operational Debt and Default:Grey Orange provided warehouse automation systems to Quickdel and raised invoices that were not disputed. Quickdel acknowledged the debt multiple times, including through emails and a written confirmation on 2-8-2016, confirming an amount of Rs. 42,49,251 as due. Legal notices for recovery were sent but remained unresponded. The Tribunal found that the operational debt was unpaid and default had occurred.3. Pre-existing Dispute:Quickdel argued that disputes existed from the inception of the agreement, citing various communications and a complaint to the Economic Offences Wing. However, the Tribunal found that the disputes were not genuine. The emails acknowledging successful automation and the debt were accepted as valid. Quickdel's claims of pre-existing disputes were deemed spurious, hypothetical, and unsupported by evidence.4. Limitation Period for Filing the Application:The date of default was contested, with Quickdel arguing that the limitation started from 14-9-2015. However, the Tribunal held that the acknowledgment of debt on 2-8-2016 gave a fresh cause of action, making the application filed on 22-5-2019 within the limitation period as per Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.5. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP):Grey Orange did not propose an IRP. The Tribunal, following the guidelines and panel provided by the National Company Law Tribunal, appointed Mr. Somnath Gupta as the IRP. His credentials were verified, and there were no adverse findings against him.6. Declaration of Moratorium:The Tribunal declared a moratorium in terms of Section 14 of the Code, prohibiting suits, transferring assets, foreclosing security interests, and recovering properties occupied by the corporate debtor. Essential supplies to the corporate debtor were to continue during the moratorium period. The order of moratorium would remain effective until the completion of the CIRP or until the approval of a resolution plan or liquidation order.Conclusion:The Tribunal admitted the application for initiation of CIRP against Quickdel Logistics Pvt. Ltd., declared a moratorium, and appointed Mr. Somnath Gupta as the IRP. The Tribunal directed the IRP to manage the corporate debtor's affairs, constitute a Committee of Creditors, and submit regular progress reports.
TaxTMI 