TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds decision on advertisement expenditure dispute, rejects Revenue's appeal.</h1> <h3>The DCIT, Circle-16 (2), New Delhi. Versus M/s. Miele India Pvt. Ltd.</h3> The DCIT, Circle-16 (2), New Delhi. Versus M/s. Miele India Pvt. Ltd. - TMI Issues:Challenge against deletion of addition of Rs. 2,06,37,597/- on account of advertisement expenditure under section 37 of the I.T. Act, 1961.Analysis:1. Issue of Disallowance of Advertisement Expenditure:- The Assessing Officer disallowed the advertisement expenditure as capital in nature, while the Ld. CIT(A) noted it as revenue expenditure.- The Ld. CIT(A) considered the similarity with previous cases and decided in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition.- The Ld. CIT(A) found the facts and circumstances similar to the A.Y. 2013-2014 case and followed the same approach, allowing the appeal of the assessee.2. Judicial Precedent and Tribunal Order:- The learned counsel for the assessee referred to the ITAT Delhi Bench's order for the A.Y. 2010-2011 which dismissed the Departmental Appeal on identical grounds.- The Tribunal in the A.Y. 2010-2011 case emphasized that advertisement expenditure does not provide enduring benefit and cannot be treated as an intangible asset.- The Ld. D.R. also acknowledged that the issue is covered in favor of the assessee by the Tribunal's previous order.- Considering the Tribunal's previous order, the current Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, stating that the issue is covered in favor of the assessee.3. Final Decision:- The Tribunal, after reviewing the facts and the previous Tribunal order, concluded that the issue is in favor of the assessee and dismissed the appeal of the Revenue.- The final decision was pronounced in the open court, with the appeal of the Revenue being dismissed.This detailed analysis highlights the key points of the judgment, focusing on the disallowance of advertisement expenditure, the relevance of previous judicial precedents, and the final decision of the Tribunal in favor of the assessee based on the existing legal framework and interpretations.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
