Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents could withhold the petitioner's pensionary benefits and gratuity in the absence of a departmental enquiry, a finding of guilt, or ascertainable Government dues.
Analysis: The petitioner's pensionary benefits were withheld on the basis of alleged recovery from miscellaneous advances and alleged loss to the State Treasury. The relevant pension framework permits withholding or withdrawal of pension in specified situations and also permits recovery of ascertainable Government dues. However, the record did not disclose any departmental enquiry, any punishment imposed on the petitioner, or any finding that he had been held guilty of causing loss to the State Government. The reply also did not establish that the claimed amount constituted ascertainable Government dues within the meaning of the pension rules.
Conclusion: The respondents were not justified in withholding the petitioner's pensionary benefits, and the writ petition was allowed.