TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed: Tribunal Upholds ITAT Decision on Trading Account Inclusion</h1> <h3>M/s. Gopal Mills Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala and another</h3> M/s. Gopal Mills Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala and another - TMI Issues:1. Legality of orders Annexures P-1 and P-32. Rejection of books of accounts based on presumptions and conjectures3. Legality of addition on account of G.P. rate4. Sustaining rejection of books of account without discrepancies post search and seizure5. Inclusion of surrendered amount in trading account for calculation of loss and profit rateAnalysis:1. The appellant appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowing the revenue's appeal. The substantial question of law raised pertained to the legality of orders Annexures P-1 and P-3. The appeal was admitted only concerning the addition on account of G.P. rate.2. The assessment year in question was 1990-91. During a search on the business premises, excess stock worth &8377; 10,50,000 was found, and discrepancies in maintaining up-to-date books of account were noted. The Assessing Officer rejected the books of account considering factors like high electricity consumption and a low G.P. Rate. The income was assessed at 2% G.P. Rate, resulting in a total assessable income of &8377; 8,33,845.3. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted an addition of &8377; 5,41,148 based on the estimated gross profit of 2%. However, the Tribunal overturned this decision and allowed the revenue's appeal. The appellant contended that the surrendered amount should have been considered for calculating the gross profit.4. The Tribunal reasoned that the surrendered amount of &8377; 10,50,000 was related to unexplained investment in stock and did not represent the profit from unaccounted transactions. The Assessing Officer had already considered a profit of &8377; 3,06,705 as part of the surrendered amount before making the addition. The Tribunal's conclusion was found to be reasonable and warranted no interference.5. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, emphasizing that the surrendered amount did not reflect profits from transactions but unexplained investments. The appellant's argument regarding the G.P. Rate was deemed unfounded, and no substantial question of law arose. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
