Court Orders Inspections & Enforcement to Curb Illegal Teer-Counters

The court directed the State to conduct inspections, enforce licensing and GST requirements, and take action against unauthorized activities by respondent No.9-Association regarding illegal teer-counters. The judgment emphasized strict enforcement to prevent revenue loss and ensure compliance with the Act of 2018, leading to the disposal of the writ petition with directions for closure of unlicensed teer-counters and enforcement of regulatory measures.

---

---

Issues:
1. Illegal operation of teer-counters without licenses under the Act of 2018.
2. Lack of age restrictions for teer betting and violation of distance regulations under Section 6 of the Act of 2018.
3. Allegations against respondent No.9-Association for issuing NOCs and collecting unauthorized fees.
4. Discrepancies in the number of licensed bookmakers and illegal teer-counters.
5. Alleged tax evasion and revenue loss to the State exchequer.
6. Enforcement of the Meghalaya Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.
7. Compliance with the provisions of the Act of 2018 and rules framed therein.

Detailed Analysis:

1. The petitioner filed a PIL seeking the closure of illegally operating teer-counters and enforcement of age restrictions and distance regulations under the Act of 2018. Allegations were made against respondent No.9-Association for issuing unauthorized NOCs and collecting fees without authority.

2. The petitioner's counsel highlighted the prevalence of illegal teer-counters in Garo Hills, lack of age restrictions, and non-compliance with distance regulations. Allegations were made against respondent No.9-Association for unauthorized fee collection and issuance of NOCs.

3. The petitioner, through RTI, revealed discrepancies between licensed bookmakers and the actual number of teer-counters, indicating widespread illegal operations. Allegations of tax evasion and revenue loss were raised against respondent No.9-Association.

4. The State authorities denied knowledge of illegal activities and emphasized their commitment to enforcing the Act of 2018. They clarified that no licenses were granted to respondent No.9-Association and highlighted efforts to ensure compliance with GST registration.

5. The court emphasized the importance of compliance with the Act of 2018, especially regarding licensing, age restrictions, and distance regulations for teer-counters. It issued directions for inspections, closure of unlicensed teer-counters, and enforcement of GST registration.

6. The judgment directed the State to conduct inspections, ensure compliance with licensing and GST requirements, and take action against unauthorized activities by respondent No.9-Association. The court emphasized the need for strict enforcement to prevent revenue loss.

7. The writ petition was disposed of with directions to the State for inspection, closure of unlicensed teer-counters, enforcement of GST registration, and actions against unauthorized activities by respondent No.9-Association. Compliance with the Act of 2018 was emphasized to prevent revenue loss and ensure regulatory compliance.

---