Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court could direct registration of an FIR and investigation by the police, or whether the complainant ought to have been relegated to the remedy before the Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: The settled position is that when a grievance is raised about non-registration of an FIR, or about improper investigation after registration, the aggrieved person may approach the Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. That provision enables the Magistrate to direct registration of an FIR, order proper investigation, and monitor the investigation if necessary. The High Court ought not to bypass this statutory mechanism by issuing such directions in writ or supervisory jurisdiction. The existence of a civil dispute does not by itself preclude registration or investigation if the complaint discloses a cognizable offence, though a civil dispute should not be given a criminal colour. The Court also noted the impropriety of proceeding with the FIR despite the subsisting stay.
Conclusion: The direction of the High Court to register an FIR and have the police investigate was set aside, and the parties were left to pursue the statutory remedy before the Magistrate or to place materials before the police as permissible.