Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sums attributable to an undisclosed source arising prior to 31 March 1961 could be assessed in assessment year 1962-63 under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether section 297(2)(b) of that Act displaced the rule that such income was assessable in the immediately following year.
Analysis: The sums in question related to a period prior to 31 March 1961 and were treated as income from undisclosed sources. The governing principle was that, where no accounts exist for an undisclosed source and no option under the corresponding provision of the 1922 Act is shown, such income is assessable on the basis of the ordinary financial year and in the immediately following assessment year. Section 297(2)(b) of the 1961 Act was held to apply only the procedural machinery of the new Act to returns filed after its commencement and not to enlarge or alter the substantive liability of the assessee. Since the dispute concerned liability, the revenue could not rely on that provision to justify assessment in assessment year 1962-63.
Conclusion: The inclusion of the disputed sums in assessment year 1962-63 was unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Transitional provisions preserving the procedure of a repealed income-tax statute do not alter the substantive year of assessability of undisclosed income, which remains governed by the rule that such income is assessable in the immediately following assessment year.