Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods and the vehicle detained for non-entry of Part-B of the e-way bill were liable to be released pending adjudication, and whether such default could be treated as a minor breach for the purpose of detention and penalty.
Analysis: The detention arose from omission to fill Part-B of the e-way bill. The Court accepted that the default attracted the statutory detention mechanism under the GST law and that the breach could not be treated as a minor one in view of the tax involved. At the same time, the Court directed that the detained vehicle and goods be released forthwith on the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for the amount indicated in the detention proceedings, while preserving the department's right to complete adjudication after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The goods and vehicle were ordered to be released against bank guarantee, and the detention proceedings were left to be adjudicated in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: Interim release was granted to the petitioner, but the departmental proceedings on tax and penalty were allowed to continue to final adjudication.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are detained for a GST e-way bill violation, the Court may direct release against bank guarantee while permitting adjudication of the alleged contravention to proceed after hearing the person concerned.