Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 could be maintained against a corporate guarantor for the same debt and default after an application on the same claim had already been admitted against the principal borrower.
Analysis: The liability of a guarantor is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor, and a financial creditor may proceed against the guarantor under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. However, where the same financial creditor has already obtained admission of a Section 7 application against one corporate debtor for the very same debt and default, a second application for the same claim cannot be admitted against the other corporate debtor. On the facts, the application against the principal borrower had already been admitted on the same date as the application against the corporate guarantor.
Conclusion: The Section 7 application against the corporate guarantor was not maintainable and was liable to be dismissed; the appeal succeeded.