TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court affirms Tribunal's decision on deduction claim under Tax Act for 2006-07</h1> <h3>The Commissioner of Income tax, Chennai. Versus M/s. RR Donnelley India Outsources Pvt. Ltd.</h3> The Commissioner of Income tax, Chennai. Versus M/s. RR Donnelley India Outsources Pvt. Ltd. - TMI Issues:Appeal against the order recalling the earlier Tribunal decision in a tax case involving deduction under Section 10B and 10A of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07.Analysis:The case involved an appeal against the order recalling the earlier Tribunal decision in a tax case related to the deduction under Section 10B and 10A of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The assessee, engaged in providing BPO solutions, initially filed a return of income for &8377; 60,37,272/-, later revised to &8377; 80,22,796/-. The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) with an income of &8377; 2,89,97,211/- after allowing deductions under Section 10B. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer reopened the assessment under Section 147 due to lack of Board approval for claiming Section 10B deduction. The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) rws 147, withdrawing the Section 10B benefit. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed this decision, leading the assessee to appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to consider the eligibility for deduction under Section 10A as an alternate remedy, as no other grounds were urged. The appellant filed a petition to recall this order, claiming all grounds were raised, but the Tribunal mistakenly noted otherwise. The petition was allowed, prompting the appellant to file the present appeal. The High Court noted that the appeal was admitted and observed that the Tribunal had disposed of the original appeal by remitting the claim of deduction under Section 10A back for the assessment year 2006-07. The High Court confirmed the Tribunal's order and kept the questions of law framed open.In conclusion, the High Court disposed of the appeal with no costs, confirming the Tribunal's decision to remit the claim of deduction under Section 10A back for the assessment year 2006-07. The Court maintained that the questions of law framed were kept open for further consideration.
TaxTMI 