Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (3) TMI 937 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Tribunal Overturns Penalty: Income Not 'Undisclosed,' Call for Judicious Penalty Decisions by Assessing Officers. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, determining that the penalty levied under Section 271AAB was not sustainable in law. It was emphasized ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tax Tribunal Overturns Penalty: Income Not "Undisclosed," Call for Judicious Penalty Decisions by Assessing Officers.

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, determining that the penalty levied under Section 271AAB was not sustainable in law. It was emphasized that the Assessing Officer (AO) must make a judicious decision regarding the imposition of penalties, taking into account all relevant facts and ensuring that the conditions under Section 271AAB are met. The Tribunal concluded that the surrendered income did not qualify as "undisclosed income" under the section, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed by the AO.




                          Issues involved:
                          1. Validity of the penalty order under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Whether the income surrendered by the assessee qualifies as "undisclosed income" under Section 271AAB.
                          3. Justification of the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 271AAB.

                          Issue-wise detailed analysis:

                          1. Validity of the penalty order under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

                          The assessee challenged the validity of the penalty order under Section 271AAB, arguing that the order was void ab initio. The Tribunal analyzed whether the penalty under Section 271AAB is mandatory or discretionary. It was noted that the penalty under this section is not automatic but requires the AO to issue a show cause notice and provide an opportunity for the assessee to explain their case. The Tribunal referred to the decision in the case of Ravi Mathur vs. DCIT, which clarified that the AO must take a decision after considering all facts and circumstances and ensure that the conditions specified under Section 271AAB are satisfied. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271AAB is not mandatory but discretionary and must be based on a judicious decision by the AO.

                          2. Whether the income surrendered by the assessee qualifies as "undisclosed income" under Section 271AAB:

                          The Tribunal examined if the surrendered income of Rs. 10.00 lacs qualifies as "undisclosed income" as defined under Section 271AAB. The definition of "undisclosed income" includes income represented by money, bullion, jewelry, or other valuable articles or things, or entries in books of accounts or other documents found during the search. The Tribunal found that the seized documents (Electric Plan and Site Map) did not reveal any undisclosed income or unaccounted expenditure. The documents were merely a design plan and did not indicate actual expenditure or unaccounted income. The Tribunal concluded that the surrendered income did not fall within the definition of "undisclosed income" under Section 271AAB.

                          3. Justification of the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 271AAB:

                          The AO had imposed a penalty of Rs. 3.00 lacs under Section 271AAB, arguing that the surrendered income was assessable under Section 69 and taxable at 30% as per Section 115BBE. The Tribunal noted that the AO must ensure that the conditions for levying the penalty under Section 271AAB are met, including the existence of "undisclosed income" as defined in the Act. The Tribunal found that the seized documents did not substantiate any unaccounted expenditure or undisclosed income. The Tribunal also referred to the decision in Ravi Mathur vs. DCIT, which emphasized the need for the AO to objectively analyze the facts and circumstances before imposing the penalty. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the penalty imposed by the AO was not justified as the surrendered income did not qualify as "undisclosed income."

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the penalty levied under Section 271AAB was not sustainable in law. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO must judiciously decide on the imposition of the penalty after considering all relevant facts and ensuring that the conditions under Section 271AAB are satisfied. The Tribunal deleted the penalty imposed by the AO, concluding that the surrendered income did not fall within the definition of "undisclosed income" under Section 271AAB.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found