Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue appeal was maintainable in view of the CBDT circulars prescribing monetary limits for filing departmental appeals.
Analysis: The appeal involved tax effect below the threshold prescribed by the CBDT's circular issued on 08.08.2019, which operated in conjunction with Circular No. 3/2018 and substituted the relevant monetary-limit paragraphs. The decision relied on the settled policy that pending appeals of the Department are also governed by the enhanced monetary limits, and the appeal was treated as falling within that policy. The request that liberty be reserved to seek revival in cases covered by exceptions or involving incorrect computation of tax effect was accepted, but it did not alter the threshold-based maintainability analysis.
Conclusion: The Revenue appeal was held to be non-maintainable and was dismissed.
Final Conclusion: Departmental appeals below the prescribed tax-effect limit cannot be pursued before the Tribunal under the applicable CBDT policy, and such appeals are liable to be dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the tax effect in a departmental appeal falls below the monetary limit prescribed by the applicable CBDT circulars, the appeal is non-maintainable and must be dismissed.