Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods cleared in a wholesale pack containing bubble gums and additional toffees could be split for valuation so as to apply Section 4A to one component and Section 4 to the other, and whether the revenue could demand duty on the basis proposed in the show cause notice.
Analysis: The pack was accepted as not being a retail sale pack. Once the goods were cleared in the composite form of a wholesale pack, the valuation had to be made on the pack as cleared and not by disintegrating its contents and applying different valuation provisions to different components. The proposed demand did not seek valuation of the entire pack under the appropriate provision for the form in which it was cleared. The tribunal followed the settled principle that where a composite pack is cleared as such, its valuation cannot be artificially split for separate treatment of its contents.
Conclusion: The revenue's valuation approach was not sustainable, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A composite wholesale pack must be valued in the form in which it is cleared, and its contents cannot be artificially segregated for separate application of different valuation provisions.