Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rent for November 2018 also required inclusion in the operative direction, and whether the tenants were liable to pay GST at 18% on monthly rent exceeding the statutory threshold.
Analysis: The omission of November 2018 from the operative portion was treated as an apparent error, since the underlying order itself recorded entitlement to that month's rent. The Court further held that where the admitted monthly rent was Rs. 3,50,462/- and the annual rent exceeded Rs. 20 lakhs, liability to pay GST attached to the tenant under the GST regime. It therefore directed monthly deposit of GST on the rent, payment of arrears from November 2018 onwards, issuance of invoices by the landlords, and permitted withdrawal of the deposited sums for onward transmission to the competent authority.
Conclusion: The revision was allowed, the rent for November 2018 was included, and the tenants were directed to pay GST on the rent as well.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was corrected to include the omitted rent component and to fasten GST payment obligations on the tenants in respect of the rent payable to the petitioners.
Ratio Decidendi: An obvious omission in the operative part of an order may be corrected in revision, and where rent exceeds the statutory threshold, GST liability on the rent is payable by the tenant.