Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the activity undertaken by the applicant amounted to manufacture so as to justify rebate on export of the goods and consequential re-credit of the duty debited through Cenvat credit.
Analysis: The exported goods were found to be a supplied JCB machine with standard accessories and not a customised product manufactured by the applicant. The export order and packing list showed the engine, cold start kit and accessories as separate items, and the claimed fitting or modification at the applicant's end was not corroborated. The applicant was not registered for such manufacturing activity, and the transaction was treated as trading in bought-out goods rather than manufacture within the meaning of Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Conclusion: The activity did not amount to manufacture, rebate was not admissible, and the claim for re-credit of the debited Cenvat amount was also rejected.