TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal sets aside order deeming share transfer violation, mandates IRDAI approval for compliance</h1> <h3>Nippon India Mutual Fund Versus Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority of India</h3> Nippon India Mutual Fund Versus Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority of India - TMI Issues:1. Violation of Insurance Act and Transfer of Equity Shares Regulations by the respondent.2. Invocation of pledge on shares and subsequent actions by the appellants.3. Representation made by the appellants to IRDAI regarding the pledge.4. Stand of IRDAI and subsequent communication regarding the shares held in pledge.5. Decision of the Tribunal on the nullity of the transfer/pledge and directions given.Issue 1: Violation of Insurance Act and Transfer of Equity Shares RegulationsThe appeal was filed against IRDAI's order deeming the transfer of shares by the respondent as a violation of Section 6A(4)(b)(iii) of the Insurance Act along with Regulation 3 of the Transfer of Equity Shares Regulations. The transfer was considered null and void as it lacked prior approval from the authority, leading to the appeal challenging this decision.Issue 2: Invocation of pledge on shares and subsequent actionsAppellant No. 1 exercised the put option to sell NCDs and requested the pledge on shares to be invoked when the NCDs were not repurchased by the respondent. IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. invoked the pledge and took possession of the shares, leading to the initiation of the legal proceedings and the subsequent appeal against the nullity of the transfer/pledge.Issue 3: Representation made by the appellants to IRDAIThe appellants made a representation to IRDAI, clarifying that the shares were held in trust and that no control was intended over the company. They assured compliance with statutory duties and sought approval before any transfer of shares to a buyer, emphasizing their adherence to applicable laws and regulations.Issue 4: Stand of IRDAI and subsequent communicationIRDAI, in response to the representation, acknowledged the shares were held in trust and advised compliance with Insurance Act provisions upon any future transfer. The subsequent communication indicated a shift in IRDAI's stance, emphasizing the need for due diligence and fulfillment of criteria before any transfer of shares.Issue 5: Decision of the Tribunal on nullity of transfer/pledgeThe Tribunal, considering the communication and subsequent developments, set aside the order declaring the transfer/pledge null and void ab initio. It directed that the shares held in pledge were to be managed by IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. as custodian for finding a suitable buyer. Approval from IRDAI was mandated for any transfer, ensuring due diligence and compliance with regulatory criteria, while prohibiting any control or influence over the company by the trustee.This comprehensive analysis covers the issues surrounding the violation of regulations, invocation of pledge, representations made to IRDAI, responses from IRDAI, and the final decision of the Tribunal regarding the nullity of the transfer/pledge and the subsequent directions provided for managing the shares in question.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
