Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether depreciation under section 32 was allowable in the individual assessment of an assessee who owned the assets but allowed them to be used in the profession carried on through a partnership firm of which he was a member.
Analysis: Depreciation under section 32 of the Income-tax Act is available in respect of buildings, machinery, plant or furniture owned by the assessee and used for the purposes of business or profession. The assessee was found to be the owner of the clinic and nursing home assets. The only dispute was whether, after the formation of the partnership, those assets could still be treated as used for the assessee's own profession. The governing principle applied was that, in law, a partnership business is not carried on by the firm as an entity distinct from its partners, but is treated as the business of the partners themselves.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to depreciation in his individual assessment, as the assets owned by him were used for the purposes of his profession through the partnership.
Ratio Decidendi: For depreciation under section 32, ownership of the asset and its user in the assessee's business or profession are sufficient; where the assessee is a partner in the firm using the asset, the user is attributable to the partner because the firm's business is in law the business of the partners.