Tribunal upholds CIT(A)'s findings on disallowances, mark to market loss, and capital receipts

The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s findings on all contested issues, including disallowance under Section 14A, mark to market loss on index options, and discount on buyback of debentures. The Tribunal referred to relevant case laws and upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions, emphasizing that certain receipts are capital in nature. The order was pronounced on February 17, 2020.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.
2. Disallowance of mark to market loss on index options.
3. Disallowance on account of discount on buyback of debentures.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962:
The assessee contested the disallowance made under Section 14A of the Act r.w. Rule 8D(2)(iii). The assessee earned a dividend income of Rs. 3,83,579/- and made a suo-motu disallowance of Rs. 11,90,846/-. However, the Assessing Officer computed a disallowance of Rs. 7,04,83,104/-. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance on interest expenditure by following precedents from the Hon'ble Bombay High Court. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the disallowance under Section 14A cannot exceed the exempt income earned and only investments yielding exempt income should be considered. The Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for recomputation in line with the principles laid down in relevant case laws.

2. Disallowance of mark to market loss on index options:
The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s deletion of a disallowance of Rs. 20,52,47,434/- for mark to market loss on index options, arguing that such loss is notional and contingent. The Tribunal noted that this issue had been previously decided in favor of the assessee in its own case for the preceding assessment year, where it was held that the mark to market loss claimed by the assessee is allowable. Consequently, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order and dismissed this ground of the Revenue's appeal.

3. Disallowance on account of discount on buyback of debentures:
The Revenue also contested the CIT(A)'s deletion of a disallowance of Rs. 18,97,915/- related to the discount on buyback of debentures. The Assessing Officer had treated the difference between the face value and the buyback price as business income, whereas the CIT(A) considered it capital in nature. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing the Karnataka High Court's ruling in CIT vs. Industrial Credit & Development Syndicate Ltd., which established that such receipts are capital in nature and not income. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)'s conclusion that the amount received on redemption of debentures reduces the loan liability, which is capital in nature.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, thereby upholding the CIT(A)'s findings on all contested issues. The order was pronounced in the open court on February 17, 2020.

---