High Court grants writ petition challenging Customs Commissioner's order on SAD refund under Notification No.102/2007-Cus.

The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the impugned order by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II) regarding the refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) under Notification No.102/2007-Cus. The Court relied on previous favorable decisions by the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal and a Single Judge of the Court, directing the refund of the duty paid by the petitioner within two weeks. The judgment underscores the importance of consistency in judicial decisions and adherence to legal principles in customs disputes, ensuring fair treatment and upholding parties' rights.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to impugned order passed by the office of The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II) regarding refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) under Notification No.102/2007-Cus dated 14.09.2007.

Analysis:
The petitioner challenged the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II) regarding the refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) under Notification No.102/2007-Cus dated 14.09.2007. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeal) confirmed the order claiming the refund of SAD, which was accepted by the Department. The High Court noted that similar issues were decided in favor of the importer by the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in an order dated 02.06.2017, which was also accepted by the Department. Consequently, the High Court allowed the writ petition based on a previous order by a Single Judge of the Court dated 23.09.2019 in related cases, directing the refund of the special additional duty paid by the petitioner within two weeks. The connected miscellaneous petitions were closed, and no costs were imposed.

This judgment highlights the importance of consistency in decisions across different levels of the judicial system. The Court relied on previous orders and decisions to support its ruling in favor of the petitioner. It underscores the significance of adherence to legal principles and precedents in matters related to customs duties and refunds. The judgment also emphasizes the role of the judiciary in ensuring fair treatment and upholding the rights of parties involved in customs disputes. The Court's decision to allow the writ petition and direct the refund underscores the importance of legal clarity and adherence to established procedures in customs matters.

---