Appellate ruling: IFAB's flower auction commission not GST exempt under Entry 54(g)

The appellate authority determined that the commission earned from auctioning flowers by International Flower Auction Bangalore Limited (IFAB) is not eligible for exemption under entry no. 54(g) of Notification No. 12/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The services provided by IFAB were classified as 'auctioneer services' subject to GST, as they were found to go beyond mere commission agent services. The appeal by the Commissioner of Central Tax, Bangalore North Commissionerate, was allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the commission earned from auctioning of flowers is covered under entry no. 54(g) of Notification No. 12/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and entry no. 54(g) of Notification (12/2017) FD 48 CSL 2017 dated 29.06.2017.
2. Classification of the services provided by the respondent company – whether as a ‘commission agent’ or as an ‘auctioneer service’.
3. Eligibility for exemption under the specified notification entries.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Commission Earned from Auctioning of Flowers:
The respondent company, International Flower Auction Bangalore Limited (IFAB), facilitates the auctioning of flowers and charges a commission from both growers and buyers. The company filed for an advance ruling to determine if this commission is exempt from GST under entry no. 54(g) of Notification No. 12/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, which exempts services provided by a commission agent for the sale or purchase of agricultural produce.

2. Classification of Services:
The respondent company argued that their activities fall within the definition of an ‘agent’ as per Section 2(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, and that cut flowers are considered ‘agricultural produce’ as defined in the notification. The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) initially ruled that the relationship between IFAB and the growers is one of agent and principal, thus qualifying for the exemption.

However, the appellate authority scrutinized the nature of services provided by IFAB, which include auction management, storage, packing, and other ancillary services. The appellate authority concluded that IFAB’s activities go beyond mere commission agent services and align more closely with ‘auctioneer services’. The appellate authority emphasized that the nature of activities performed by an auctioneer and a commission agent are fundamentally different, with auctioneers conducting public sales and handling the entire auction process, including payment collection and distribution.

3. Eligibility for Exemption:
The appellate authority determined that the exemption under entry no. 54(g) of Notification No. 12/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017 is specific to services provided by a commission agent for the sale or purchase of agricultural produce. Since IFAB’s services are classified as ‘auctioneer services’ rather than those of a commission agent, they do not qualify for the exemption. The authority highlighted that exemption notifications must be strictly interpreted, and the specific wording of the notification does not extend to auctioneer services.

Conclusion:
The appellate authority set aside the initial advance ruling, concluding that the commission earned from auctioning flowers by IFAB is not eligible for exemption under entry no. 54(g) of Notification No. 12/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The appeal by the Commissioner of Central Tax, Bangalore North Commissionerate, was allowed, and the services provided by IFAB were classified as ‘auctioneer services’ subject to GST.

---