1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>The Supreme Court of India granted leave after condoning the delay in the case.</h1> The Supreme Court of India granted leave after condoning the delay in the case. - TMI Disallowing expenditure - proof of receipt of any service from the consultant - addition on statement recorded during search operations held that the said person had not rendered any service to the assessee-company so as to receive such payments - retraction of statement - Deduction u/s 80IA - assessee had set up a captive power generating unit - rate at which the electricity generated by one unit of the assessee-company and provided to the another be valued - HELD THAT:- Delay condoned. Leave granted. The Supreme Court of India in 2020 (3) TMI 56 - SC Order, with judges Rohinton Fali Nariman and Surya Kant, granted leave after condoning the delay. Sanjay Jain, ASG, Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv., D.L. Chidanand, Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Advs., and Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR represented the Petitioner.