TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeals on Excise Act issues not maintainable; Supreme Court recourse directed</h1> <h3>The Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise Versus M/s. Welspun India Ltd.</h3> The Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise Versus M/s. Welspun India Ltd. - TMI Issues:1. Benefit of Exemption Notification No. 39/2001-CE for goods manufactured post cut-off date.2. Impact of unit expansion post cut-off date on availing exemption.3. Invocation of larger period of limitation.4. Demand of Central Excise Duty on Finished Goods.5. Benefit of exemption notification without fulfilling conditions.6. Treatment of factory as an extension of another unit.7. Invocation of extended period for demand.8. Dropping of entire demand without reason.9. Penalty imposition justification.Issue 1:The Tax Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 questions the claim of benefit under Exemption Notification No. 39/2001-CE for goods manufactured post the cut-off date of 31.12.2005. The Court indicates that the appeal is not maintainable before them and should be filed before the Supreme Court.Issue 2:The expansion of the unit post the cut-off date and its impact on availing the benefit of Exemption Notification No. 39/2001-CE is raised. The Court determines that the appeal is not maintainable before them and should be taken to the Supreme Court.Issue 3:Regarding the invocation of a larger period of limitation, the Court notes that the appeal is not maintainable before them and suggests the Supreme Court as the appropriate forum.Issue 4:The demand of Central Excise Duty on Finished Goods, specifically in the case of Jamnagar Mobile Plant/Unit of M/s Ratnamani Metal & Tubes Limited, is contested. The Court finds that the appeal is not maintainable before them and advises approaching the Supreme Court.Issue 5:The benefit of exemption notification without fulfilling conditions is examined. The Court concludes that the appeal is not maintainable before them and directs the appellant to seek recourse at the Supreme Court.Issue 6:The treatment of a factory as an extension of another unit is deliberated upon. The Court deems the appeal not maintainable before them and recommends filing it before the Supreme Court.Issue 7:The invocation of an extended period for demand is scrutinized. The Court decides that the appeal is not maintainable before them and suggests the Supreme Court as the suitable forum.Issue 8:The dropping of the entire demand against the Jamnagar Mobile Plant/Unit of M/s Ratnamani Metal & Tubes Limited without providing a reason is analyzed. The Court finds the appeal not maintainable before them and advises approaching the Supreme Court.Issue 9:The justification for imposing penalties is considered. The Court determines that the appeal is not maintainable before them and directs the appellant to seek recourse at the Supreme Court.
TaxTMI 