Taxability of compensation interest, unexplained cash deposits, and TDS credit depend on classification, proof, and statutory verification.

Interest on compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land was discussed with reference to the distinction between interest under sections 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the post-amendment position under section 56(2)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; tax treatment depends on the character of the amount, and the matter was remitted for verification of that classification. Unexplained cash deposits were treated as taxable because the assessee did not satisfactorily explain the source and the additional evidence was rejected for non-compliance with Rule 46A. TDS credit was also made subject to verification by the Assessing Officer and allowance only if admissible in law.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether interest received on enhanced compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land was exempt as part of compensation or taxable as income from other sources; (ii) Whether the addition sustained for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account was justified; (iii) Whether the assessee was entitled to credit of tax deducted at source.

Issue (i): Whether interest received on enhanced compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land was exempt as part of compensation or taxable as income from other sources?

Analysis: The dispute turned on the character of interest received under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Tribunal noted the post-amendment position under section 56(2)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the judicial distinction between interest under section 28 and interest under section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. It also considered the later jurisdictional and Supreme Court authorities relied upon in the order.

Conclusion: The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer through the CIT(A) for fresh verification of whether the amount represented interest under section 28 or section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the issue was allowed for statistical purposes.

Issue (ii): Whether the addition sustained for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account was justified?

Analysis: The assessee failed to explain the source of the cash deposits during assessment proceedings despite repeated opportunities. The additional evidence filed before the appellate authority was rejected for non-compliance with Rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, and the Tribunal found no sufficient cause for admitting it. The onus to explain the source of deposits was not discharged.

Conclusion: The addition for cash deposits was upheld and the assessee's challenge on this issue failed.

Issue (iii): Whether the assessee was entitled to credit of tax deducted at source?

Analysis: The claim for TDS credit required verification by the Assessing Officer in accordance with law.

Conclusion: The Assessing Officer was directed to examine the claim and allow credit if admissible in law.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to a limited extent, with remand on the compensation-interest issue, confirmation of the cash deposit addition, and direction regarding TDS credit.

Ratio Decidendi: Interest on amounts received for compulsory acquisition must be classified according to the governing provision of the Land Acquisition Act and, after the statutory amendment, taxability depends on that classification; unexplained cash deposits remain taxable where the assessee fails to discharge the burden of explanation and additional evidence is not admissible under Rule 46A.

---