TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Allowed: Deduction Claim Upheld for Overseas Property Purchase</h1> <h3>Shri Rajasugumar Subramani Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1), Bengaluru.</h3> Shri Rajasugumar Subramani Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1), Bengaluru. - TMI Issues:- Denial of deduction u/s. 54/54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessee's claim.Analysis:1. Background: The appeal concerns the denial of the claim for deduction u/s. 54/54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the revenue authorities for the assessment year 2013-14.2. Facts: The assessee, an individual, sold a property and invested the capital gain in a residential house in Texas. The assessing officer (AO) disallowed the deduction u/s. 54/54F on the grounds that the property sold was a vacant site and the new asset was purchased outside India.3. AO's Decision: The AO computed the capital gain and denied the deduction u/s. 54/54F, resulting in a taxable long-term capital gain of Rs. 1,89,50,133.4. CIT(Appeals) Decision: The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision on disallowing the deduction u/s. 54/54F but provided some relief on the quantum of capital gain.5. Tribunal's Analysis: The Tribunal considered the assessee's reliance on precedents where deductions u/s. 54F were allowed for properties purchased outside India. Referring to various cases, the Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to deduction u/s. 54F even for properties acquired abroad, based on the plain language of the statute.6. Tribunal's Decision: The Tribunal directed the AO to reexamine the deduction claim under section 54F in line with the cited decisions, allowing the assessee's claim for deduction. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.7. Conclusion: The Tribunal's decision clarified that the assessee is entitled to claim deduction u/s. 54F for properties purchased outside India, based on the plain language of the statute and consistent judicial precedents. The AO was directed to allow the deduction after due consideration, resulting in the appeal being treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
TaxTMI 